Code and architecture
Code quality, where the architecture stops scaling, test coverage and release discipline; which decision will cost later.
Technical due diligence before the investment and development capacity for the portfolio company after it. You see, in writing, what the code, the architecture and the team actually look like.
Code quality, where the architecture stops scaling, test coverage and release discipline; which decision will cost later.
How large the inherited debt is, how much of it is urgent and in what order it should be paid down.
Authentication, authorization, data boundaries, secret management and open ends on the GDPR/KVKK side.
Open-source licence compliance, vendor lock-in and knowledge that depends on a single person.
How cloud cost behaves as usage grows, where the waste is and where capacity runs out.
Real capacity of the team, how knowledge is spread, deployment frequency and incident-handling maturity.
What will be examined and which access is granted; NDA and, where used, the data room setup.
Code, infrastructure, process records and interviews with the team; findings are collected with evidence.
Every finding is sorted as “affects the investment decision / handle in the first year / noted”.
If you want it, the same team continues in the portfolio company as development capacity, hiring support or interim technical leadership.
The scope is narrowed to the questions that actually affect your decision. Looking in the right place beats looking everywhere.
It depends on scope and the access granted. A single-product team and a multi-system estate are not reviewed in the same time; we narrow the scope and set the schedule together in the first call.
Only partly. Architecture, infrastructure and process produce meaningful findings, but code quality and technical debt need the source. We state clearly in the report what could not be assessed.
You do. Whether to share it is your decision; we do not share it with the target company.
We disclose any possible conflict of interest before starting. If needed we decline the work — trust is worth more than one engagement.
Yes, if you want that. But the review is done for the decision, not to win the build; not continuing with us does not change what the report says.